Lebanese Journalist: Gaza Chose Hamas and War Over Peace After 2005 Israeli Withdrawal

In a recent statement, prominent Lebanese journalist Nadim Koteich offered a sharp critique of the ongoing conflict in Gaza, attributing the region’s persistent violence to the choices made by its leadership and residents following Israel’s complete withdrawal from the territory in 2005. Koteich argues that Gaza had a unique opportunity to pursue autonomy, peace, and economic prosperity but instead embraced Hamas and Islamic Jihad, groups he accuses of prioritizing war and terrorism over the well-being of their people.

According to Koteich, Israel’s disengagement from Gaza in 2005, which included the evacuation of all Israeli settlements and military forces, handed the region a chance to chart its own course. The withdrawal was seen by many as a pivotal moment that could have led to the establishment of a self-governing, peaceful Gaza. However, Koteich contends that the decision to support Hamas—a group designated as a terrorist organization by multiple countries—steered Gaza toward a path of conflict, destruction, and instability.

“Hamas and Islamic Jihad have consistently chosen violence over dialogue,” Koteich stated, pointing to the groups’ rocket attacks, tunnel operations, and other militant activities as evidence of their commitment to confrontation with Israel. He argues that these actions have not only perpetuated the cycle of violence but also stifled Gaza’s potential for economic growth and self-determination. “Gaza could have been a model for autonomy and prosperity, but the choice of terrorism has led to suffering for all involved,” he added.

Koteich’s remarks come amid ongoing tensions in the region, with Gaza remaining a focal point of conflict between Palestinian factions and Israel. The journalist’s perspective underscores a broader debate about the root causes of the region’s challenges, with some blaming external factors like Israeli policies and others, like Koteich, emphasizing internal decisions and the role of militant groups.

The comments have sparked varied reactions. Supporters of Koteich’s view argue that Hamas’s governance, marked by corruption and a focus on military buildup, has hindered Gaza’s development. Critics, however, point to Israel’s blockade and restrictions on Gaza as significant barriers to peace and prosperity, arguing that these measures have limited the region’s ability to thrive post-withdrawal.

As the debate continues, Koteich’s statement highlights the complex dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with Gaza’s trajectory remaining a contentious issue. His remarks serve as a reminder of the divergent paths the region could have taken after 2005—and the consequences of the choices made.

Follow us on Twitter/X @WorldIntel24